1.Compare and contrast US naval innovation with that of Great Britain Essay

1.Compare and contrast US naval innovation with that of Great Britain. What is the dichotomy and why Use evidence from (REQUIRED READINGs) to substantiate your argument - Essay Example The United States did not heed the treaties that Great Britain recommended. They saw the need to build submarines and the advantage of using them in battle. Their naval officers highlighted the benefits of submarines during naval warfare. In conclusion, Great Britain adopted a defense-based approach whereas United States was concerned with offensive-based equipment to counter the threats posed by nations like Japan. This was evidenced by the different retaliation strategies to the German submarine threat, the Versailles treaty and different strategies for budgeting for war. US came into World War I immediately after Germany resorted into using submarines in naval warfare. By using submarines, the Germans nearly forced Great Britain out of the first war. For this reason, countries had to invest into the innovation of new weapons to counter the threat of their adversaries. The United States, after the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese, began to see the need of engaging in naval warfare. The attack forced the issuance of orders, by the US Navy, to discriminate against Japanese air and naval warfare. Following the raids on their vessels, the British Navy marshaled the US Navy to abolish the use of submarines in naval warfare. However, the United States did not approve the abolition of the submarine1. The US created a submarine section in its naval force as they planned to protect themselves from an ambitious Japan. Capt. Thomas C. Hart argued that â€Å"the submarine will be an extremely valuable weapon†¦..† The submarines at the disposal of the US Navy, during the First World War, were not seaworthy and not as useful. Great Britain, unlike it counterpart the US, saw the need for a capital ship and valued the decisive nature of a fleet. This approach, according to Correlli Barnett, was misguided and resulted into the disastrous Washington treaty2. The Washington treaty showed the ‘penny-pinching’ side of the British